PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

esticular prostheses - application and clinical evaluation
Article published in Urologia Polska 2001/54/2.

authors

Tomasz Zieliński, Julia Kruk-Jeromin
Z Kliniki Chirurgii Plastycznej ICh Akademii Medycznej w £odzi Kierownik: prof, dr hab. med. Julia Kruk-Jeromin

keywords

testis, testicular protheses, complications

summary

TESTICULAR PROSTHESES - APPLICATION AND CLINICAL EVALUATION
SUMMARY
Introduction: Implantation of testicular prosthesis is most often performed in patients treated because of congenital agenesis of testes, testes hypoplasia, after amputation of a testis and in female to male transsexuals.
Material and methods: In the years 1989-1999, 25 patients were operated in the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Medical University of £ód¼. Fourteen patients had unilateral or bilateral hypoplasia or congenital agenesis of testis. One patient had a testis amputated because of leukemic infiltration. Implantations of testicular prostheses were also performed in 9 female to male transsexuals, in whom construction of penis and scrotum was done earlier. In one patient treated because of hermaphroditism a similar procedure was implemented. Implantation of 2 prosthesis was performed in 13 patients while in 12 cases 1 prosthesis was implanted.
Results: In 22 patients (88%), beside little swelling and mild pain in the operated area, no complications were observed. In 2 cases (8%) hematoma in scrotum developed. Testicular prosthesis had to be removed in 1 patient on the 6th day following the operation, because of infection, opening the wound and exposure of the implants.
Conclusion. Procedure of implantation of testicular prosthesis is relatively simpic, with low risk of complications and effective in achieving aesthetic goals.

references

  1. [1]Premiss R.J.. Boaiwrighl D.C.. Pennington R.D.. Hohn W.F., Schwartz M.H.: Testicular prosthesis: material, methods and results. J.Urol. 1963. 90. 208-210.
  2. [2] Laliimer J.K.. Vakili B.F., Smith A.M.. Morishima A.: A natural-feeling testicular prosthesis. J.Urol. 1973. 110, 81-83.
  3. [3] Puranik S.R., Mencia L.F., Gilbert M.G.: Artificial testicles in children: a new silastic gel testicular prosthesis. J.Urol. 1973. 109, 735-726.
  4. [4] Elder J.S., Keating M.A.. Duckeil J.W.: Infant testicular prostheses. J.Urol. 1989, 141, 1413-1415.
  5. (5] Beer M, Kay R.: Testicular prostheses. Urol.Clin.N.Am. 1989.16. 133-138.
  6. [6] Marshall S.: Potential problems with testicular prostheses. Urology 1986.28,388-390.
  7. [7] Incrocci L... Bosch J.I..II.R.. Slob A.K.; Testicular prostheses:body image and sexual functioning. BJU Inier. 1999,84. 1043-45.
  8. [8] Sengczcr M.. Sadove R.C.: Scrotal construction by expansion oflabia majora in biological female transsexuals. Ann.Plasl.Surg.1993.31.372-376.
  9. [9] Hage J.I., Bouman F.G., Bloem J.J.: Construction a scrotum in female-lo-male transsexuals. Plasl.Reconstr.Surg. 1993. 91. 914-919.

correspondence

Tomasz Zieliński
Klinika Chirurgii Plastycznej
Ul Kopcińskiego 22 90-153 £ódæ