PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

Article published in Urologia Polska 1999/52/4.


Krzysztof H. Włodarski, Paweł Wlodarski, Bolesław Kuzaka
Zakład Histologii i Embriologii Instytutu Biostruktury (KHW, PKW) AM w Warszawie
Kierownik: prof. dr hab. S. Moskalewski
Klinika Urologiczna (BK) AM w Warszawie
Kierownik: prof. dr hab. A. Borkowski


urinary tract culture of the urothelium


The morphology and properties of human urothelium in situ
as well as the methods of its culture in vitro are briefly outlined. Normal
human urothelium can be expanded in vitro cultures. Such cultures can be
grown in vitro on biodegradable polymer system and than be used for
replacement of urethars, ureters and bladders.


  1. [1] Allen, G. R, Bryans, J. T.: Studies of an established equine cell line derwedfrom
  2. transitional cell carcinoma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1974,35,1153-1160.
  3. [2] Alroy, J., Merk, F. B., Morre, D. ]., Weinstein, R. S.: Membrane differentiation
  4. in the Golgi apparatus ofmammalian urinary bladder epithelium. Anat. Rec. 1982,
  5. 203, 429-440.
  6. [3] Alroy, ]., Goyal, V., Ucci, A. A., Klauber, G. T., Heaney, J. A., Cohen, S. M.:
  7. Cell surface coat of human and rat bladder urothelium. I. Ruthenium-red studies in
  8. non-neoplastic and neoplastic cells. Virchows Arch. B (Cell Pathol.) 1983,42,251-
  9. 262.
  10. [4] Atala, A.: Commentary on the replacement of urologic associated mucosa. J. Urol.
  11. 1996, 156, 338-339.
  12. [5] Atala, A., Vacanti, J. R, Peters, C. A., Mandell, J., Retik, A. B., Freeman
  13. A. R.: Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to
  14. biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J. Urol. 1992,148, 658-662.
  15. [6] Atala, A., Freeman, M. R., Vacanti, J. R, Shepard, }., Retik, A. B.: Implan-
  16. tation in vivo and retrieval of artificial structures consisting of rabbit and human
  17. urothelium and human bladder muscle. J. Urol. 1993,150, 608-612.
  18. [7] Candiotti, A., Ibanez, N., Monis, B.: Carbohydrate content of transitional epi-
  19. thelium of the urinary system. Experient. 1971, 27, 551-552.
  20. [8] Cilento, B. G., Freeman, M. R., Schenck, F. X., Retik, A. B., Atala, A.:
  21. Phenotypic and cytogenetic characterization of human bladder urothelia expanded in
  22. vitro. J. Urol. 1994,152, 665-670.
  23. [9] DeBoer, W. I., Rebel, J. M. }., Foekens, J. A., Vermey, M., Van der Kwast,
  24. T. H.: Characterization of mouse urothelial cell lines in different phases of transition-
  25. al-cell carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer. 1993, 54,1022-1027.
  26. [10] De la Pena, A., Oliveros, M., Tamames, J. M., Mintz, S.: Neoplastic and
  27. malignant changes of the urothelium. Br. J. Urol. 1959,31,473.
  28. [11] Firth, J. A., Hicks, R. M.: Interspecies variation in the fine structure and enzyme
  29. cytochemistry ofmammalian transitional epithelium. J. Anat. 1973,116, 31-43.
  30. [12] Fukushima, S., Arai, M., Cohen, S. M., Jacobs, J. B., Friedell, G. H.: Scan-
  31. ning electron microscopy of cyclophosphanmide-induced hyperplasia of the rat uri-
  32. nary bladder. Lab. Investig. 1981, 44, 89-96.
  33. [13] Gustafson, C. J., Eldh, J., Kratz, G.: Culture of human urothelial cells on a cell-
  34. free dermis for autotransplantation. Eur. Urol. 1998, 33, 503-506.
  35. [14] Holstein, A. F., Sandmann, }., Bressel, ML, Davidoff, M. S.: Reinvestiga-
  36. tion of the transitional epithelium (urothelium) of human ureter. Ann. Anat. 1994,
  37. 176, 109-117.
  38. [15] Hoyes, A. D., Ramus, N. L, Martin, B. G. H.: Fine structure of the epithelium
  39. of the human fetal bladder. J. Anat. 1972,11, 415-425.
  40. [16] Hutton, K. A. R., Trejdosiewicz, L. K., Thomas, D. F. M., Southgate, J.:
  41. Urothelial tissue culture for bladder reconstruction: an experimental study. J. Urol.
  42. 1993 , 150, 721-725.
  43. [17] Jacob, J., Ludgate, C. M., Forde, J., Tulloch, W.: Recent obserations on the
  44. ultrastructure of human urothelium. 1. Normal bladder of elderly subjects. Cell
  45. Tiss. Res. 1978,193, 543-560.
  46. [18] Jost, S. P., Gosling, J. A., Dixon, J. S.: The morphology of normal bladder
  47. urothelium. J. Anat. 1989,167,103-115.
  48. [19] Kirkels, W. J., Pelgrim, O. E., Debruyne, F., Vooijs, G. R, Herman, C. J.:
  49. Soft agar culture of human transitional cell carcinoma colonies from urine. Am. J.
  50. Clin. Pathol. 1982, 78, 690-694.
  51. [20] Lewis, S. A., de Moura, L. C: Incorporation of cytoplasmic vesisles into apical
  52. membrane ofmammalian urinary bladder epithelium. Nature. 1982,297,685-688.
  53. [21] Mende, T., Chambers, E.: Distribution of mucopolisacharide and alkaline phos-
  54. phatase in transitional epithelium.}. Histochem. Cytochem. 1957,5,99.
  55. [22] Minsky, B. D., Chlapowski, F. }.: Morphometric analysis of the translocation of
  56. lumenal membrane between cytoplasm and cell surface of transitional epithelial cells
  57. during the expansion-contraction cycles ofmammalian urinary bladder. J. Cell Biol.
  58. 1978, 77, 685-697.
  59. [23] Monis, B., Zambrano, D.: Ultrastructure of transitional epithelium of man. Ztsch
  60. Zellforsch. 1968, 87, 101-117.
  61. [24] Ostrowski, K., Kieler, ]., Balslev, I.: Differences in adhesion of urothelial cells to
  62. a panel of substrates are characteristic for established human urothelial cell lines
  63. differing in their transformation grade. Anticancer Res. 1990,10, 359-368.
  64. [25] OToole, C. M., Tiptaft, R. C, Stevens, A.: HLA antigen expression on urothe-
  65. lial cells: detection by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Int. J. Cancer.
  66. 1982, 29, 391-395.'
  67. [26] CToole, C. M., Povey, S., Hepburn, R, Franks, L. M:. Identity of some human
  68. bladder cancer cell lines. Nature. 1983, 301, 429-430.
  69. [27] Pletzold, J. L., Leigh, 1., Duffy, P. G., Masters, J. R. W.: Culture and charac-
  70. terization of human urothelium in vivo and in vitro. Urol. Res. 1994, 22: 67-74.
  71. [28] Sawicki, W-; Histologia, wyd. II. PZWL. Warszawa 1997, 93.
  72. [29] Scheidegger, G.: Der Aufbau des Ubwergangsepithels der Harnblase bei Schwein,
  73. Schaf Ratte und Spitznmaus. Acta Anat. 1980,107, 268-275.
  74. [30] Scheidegger, G., Ludwig, K. S.: Ultrastructural study of the transitional epithe-
  75. lium of the common. European white-toothed shrew (Crocidura russula). Experien.
  76. 1977, 33, 1507-1509.
  77. [31] Takami, Y., Matsuda, T., Yoshitaka, M., Hanumadass, M., Walter, J.:
  78. Dispase/detergent treated dermal matrix as dermal substitute. Burns. 1996,22,182-
  79. 190.
  80. [32] Tiltman, A. J., Friedell, G. H.: Effect of feedinf N-[4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-2-
  81. thiazolyl]fornmamide on mitotic activity of rat uńnary-bladder epithelium. J. Nat.
  82. Cancer Inst. 1972, 48,125-129.
  83. [33] Wlodarski, K. H.: Bone formation in soft tissues, Bone (ed) Hall B. K., vol. 5,
  84. Fracture repair and regeneration. Boca Raton, CRC Press. 1992,313-337.
  85. [34] Wlodarski, K. H., Kuzaka, B., Wlodarski, R: Species differences in uroepithe-
  86. lium-induced bone deuelopment: obserations on transplants of human uroepitheli-
  87. um in cortisone-treated mice. Eur. Urol. 1995, 27,227-231.
  88. [35] Wlodarski, K. H., Kuzaka, B., Wlodarski, R K., Torz, C: Is heterotopic bone
  89. formation, occuring near a cut ureter, a sign of osteoinductive potency of human
  90. urothelium? Urol. Int. 1995, 55,115-117.
  91. [36] Wlodarski, K. H., Kuzaka, B., Wlodarski, P. K.: Human urinary bladder-
  92. carcinoma cells are nonosteoinductive. World J. Urol. 1996,14, S16-S20.
  93. [37] Yi, E. S., Shabiak, A. S., Lacey, D. L., Bedoya, A. A., Yin, S., Housley, R.
  94. M., Danilenko, D.M., Benson, W., Cohen, A. M., Pierce, G. F., Thomson,
  95. A., Ulich, T. R.: Keratinocyte growth factor causes proliferation of urothelium in
  96. vivo. J. Urol. 1995,154,1566-1570.