PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer patients
Article published in Urologia Polska 2006/59/4.

authors

Agata Rembielak
Centrum Onkologii, Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie w Warszawie, Oddział w Gliwicach

keywords

prostate, prostate cancer, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), radiotherapy complications

summary

Introduction. Radiotherapy together with surgery and hormone treatment is an established treatment of prostate cancer. In conventional radiotherapy total doses of 70 Gy are considered as the safe upper limit due to acceptable risk of normal tissue complications in critical tissues like rectum or bladder. Several clinical studies indicate that higher doses, than prescribed in conventional radiotherapy, may be desirable to improve local control in prostate cancer. Such escalation is possible due to technical progress in radiotherapy introducing conformal techniques that have allowed also to spare surrounding normal tissues.
The aim of the study. The purpose of this paper is to present the newest technical development in external beam radiotherapy: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).
Material and methods. The spectrum of the available literature in the field of the use of IMRT in prostate cancer treatment has been reviewed. The results of clinical trials and studies concerning IMRT in the management of prostate cancer are presented.
Conclusion. With the introduction of IMRT due to further dose escalation to the prostate gland while reducing the risk of normal tissue complications better local control rates have been achieved. The long-term results of IMRT in prostate cancer require further analysis.

references

  1. Hanks GE, Schultheiss TE, Hanlon AL et al: Optimization of conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer: Report of a dose escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37, 543-550.
  2. Lee WP, Hanks GE, Hanlon AL et al: Lateral rectal shielding reduces late rectal morbidity following high dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: Further evidence foe a significant dose effect. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 35, 251-257.
  3. Katcher J, Kupelian PA, Zippe C et al: Indications for excluding the seminal vesicles when treating clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37, 871-876.
  4. Hanks GE, Lee WR, Hanlon AL et al: Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: Biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen ł10 ng/ml. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 35, 861-868.
  5. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, Fuks Z: Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and dose escalation: Where do we stand? Sem Radiat Oncol 1998, 8, 107-114.
  6. Pollack A, Zagars GK: External beam radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 39, 1011-1018.
  7. Kupelian PA, Mohan DS, Lyons J et al: Higher than standard radiation doses (72Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46, 567-574.
  8. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB et al: Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41, 491-500.
  9. Teshima T, Hanks GE, Hanlon AL et al: Rectal bleeding after conformal 3D treatment of prostate cancer: Time to occurrence, response to treatment and duration of morbidity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 39, 77-83.
  10. Lawton CA, Won M, Pilepich MV et al: Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991, 21, 935-939.
  11. Smit WG, Helle PA, van Putten WL et al: Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990, 18, 23-29.
  12. Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Norman AR et al: Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. The Lancet 1999, 353, 267-272.
  13. Zelefsky MJ, Cowen D, Fuks Z et al: Long term tolerance of high dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1999, 85, 2460-2468.
  14. Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Happersett L et al: Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2000, 55, 241-249.
  15. Grant WH, Woo SY: Clinical and financial issues for intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery. Semin Radiat Oncol 1999, 9, 99-107.
  16. Teh BS, Woo SY, Butler EB: Intensity modulated radiation therapy: A new promising technology in radiation oncology. The Oncologist 1999, 4, 433-442.
  17. Teh BS, Mai W-Y, Uhl BM et al: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49, 705-712.
  18. Chao ST, Reddy CA, Thakkar VV et al: Impact of high-dose radiation on erectile function in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60, S 270-S 271.
  19. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G et al: Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 53, 1097-1105.
  20. Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Hunt M et al: High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity ad biochemical outcome in 722 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 53, 1111-1116.
  21. Su A, Reft C, Rash C et al: A case study of radiotherapy planning for a bilateral metal hip prosthesis prostate cancer patient. Med Dosim 2005, 30, 169-175.
  22. Xia P, Pickett B, Vigneault E et al: Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51, 244-254.
  23. Pickett B, Vigneault E, Kurhanewicz J et al: Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44, 921-929.
  24. Mohan DS, Kupelian PA, Willoughby TR: Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate gland. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46, 575-580.
  25. Kupelian PA, Thakkar VV, Khuntia D et al: Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 63, 1463-1468.
  26. Amer AM, Mott J, Macka RI et al: Preciction of the benefits from dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 56, 199-207.

correspondence

Agata Rembielak
Centrum Onkologii
ul. Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15
44-101 Gliwice
tel. (032) 278 92 51
agatar@io.gliwice.pl