PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

The quality of life of urinary incontinent women before and after TVT procedure or Burch colposuspension
Article published in Urologia Polska 2006/59/1.

authors

Anna Paczkowska, Anna Grętkiewicz-Tomczyk, Zbigniew Friebe
Klinika Ginekologii Katedry Perinatologii i Ginekologii Akademii Medycznej w Poznaniu

keywords

urinary incontinence, TVT, Burch colposuspension, quality of life

summary

Introduction. This study was designed to assess the influence of two most popular surgical procedures used in stress urinary incontinence treatment on the quality of life of patients.
Material and method. The surgery was applied to 34 women, aged 33-65 (22 � TVT procedure and 12 Burch colposuspension). To evaluate their quality of life before and after the operation, modified, comparative questionnaire I-QoL was used. Patients filled it once � six months after surgery.
Results. The answers show the significant improvement of the quality of life after surgery for urinary incontinence. It is comparable for both types of procedures.
The definition of the quality of life is not clear and subjective, so despite of giving the highest notes in our I-QoL questionnaire, most of the patients were not satisfied with the surgery. They thought their urinary organs would again be absolutely healthy, like in youth.
Conclusions. Both procedures are effective in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Modified I-QoL questionnaire is a useful instrument to assess the quality of life after surgery. More, it helps patients to notice the improvement. But before starting the treatment we should ask patients about their explanation of the �quality of life�, their expectations, and inform them, that our treatment is only the repair of the disability, not making the miracles.

references

  1. 1. Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown BM, Herzog AR: Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the non ? institutionalized elderly. J Urol 1986, 136, 1022-1025.
  2. 2. Hellström L, Ekelund P, Milsom I, Mellström D: The prevalence of urinary incontinence and use of incontinence aids in 85-year-old men and women. Age Ageing 1990, 19, 383-389.
  3. 3. Molander U, Milsom I, Ekelund P, Mellström D: An epidemiological study of urinary incontinence and related urogenital symptoms in elderly women. Maturitas 1990, 12, 51-60.
  4. 4. Singla A: Nowe aspekty leczenia wysiłkowego nietrzymania moczu. Ginekologia po dyplomie 2001, t. 3, nr 1 (11), 23-33.
  5. 5. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G: An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1996, 1067, 81-86.
  6. 6. Ekelund P, Rundgren A: Urinary incontinence in the elderly with implications for hospital care consumption and social disability. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1987, 6, 11-18.
  7. 7. Griffith JM, Black NA, Pope C et al: What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998, 14, 431-445.
  8. 8. Norton C: The effects of urinary incontinence in women. Int Rehab Med 1982, 4, 9-14.
  9. 9. MacCauley AJ, Stern RS, Holmes DM, Stanton SL: Micturition and the mind: psychological factors in the etiology and treatment of urinary symptoms in women. BMJ 1987, 294, 540-543.
  10. 10. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Choi SS et al: Psychological impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol 1987, 70, 378-381.
  11. 11. Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U et al: The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing 1993, 22, 82-89.
  12. 12. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM et al: Cultural adaptation of a quality of life measure for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 1999, 36, 427-435.
  13. 13. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V et al: A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104, 1374-1379.
  14. 14. Wyman JF: Influence of functional, urological and environmental characteristics on urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older women. Nurs Res 1993, 42, 270-275.
  15. 15. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992, 305, 160-164.
  16. 16. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A: The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, 39, 378-382.
  17. 17. Swithinbank LV, Abrams P: The impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life. World J Urol 1999, 2, 225-229.
  18. 18. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG: A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002, 81, 72-77.
  19. 19. McGuire EJ, Lytton B: Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. J Urol 1978, 119, 82-84.
  20. 20. Chancellor MB: Mapping the future for incontinence treatment worldwide. Rev Urol 1999, 1, 145.
  21. 21. Jeffry L, Deval B, Birsan A et al: Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment urinary incontinence. Urology 2001, 58 (5), 702-706.
  22. 22. Zbrzeźniak MT: Nietrzymanie moczu u kobiet. Część II. Przeg Urol 2001, 1, 36-42.

correspondence

Anna Paczkowska
ul. Lotosowa 18
60-175 Poznań
tel. (061) 609 233 930
annapaczkowska@wp.pl