PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PROSTATE CANCER
Article published in Urologia Polska 1998/51/3.

authors

Grzegorz Herlinger, Jacek Rykowski, Magdalena Czubak, Jan Szymanowski
Oddział Urologii Szpitala Bielańskiego w Warszawie
Ordynator: dr med. J. Szymanowski

keywords

prostate prostate carcinoma radical prostatectomy lymphadenectomy

summary

Objective. Evaluation of lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer.
Material and methods. Radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed in
79 patients. Pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in all patients. Iliac
external, internal et obturator lymph nodes were removed bilaterally.
Results. Mean operating time was 1.5 hour. In 35 patients pelvic lymph
nodes were positive for prostate cancer. Of the patients 17% had metastases only
in iliac external nodes. 60% patients with metastases had disease stage pT3c. 50%
had PSA below 20 ng/ml. Complications occurred in 18 patients: in 1 patient
iliac vein injury, in 2 patients lymphocoele and in 15 patients scrotal oedema.
Conclusions. We conclude that standard pelvic lymph node dissection is
accurate procedure in patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical
prostatectomy. Open lymphadenectomy is safe method with low morbidity.

references

  1. [1] Bluestein, D. L., Bostwick, D. G., Bergstralh, E. I., Oesterling, J. E.:
  2. Eliminating the need for bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in selecd patients
  3. with prostate cancer. J. Urol. 1994, 151, 1315-1320.
  4. [2] Brendler, C. B., Cleeve, L. K., Anderson, E. E., Paulson, D. F.: Staging
  5. pehic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: risk versus benefit. J.
  6. Urol. 1980, 124, 849-850.
  7. [3] Campbell, S. C, Klein, E. A., Levin, H. S., Piedmonte, M. R.: Openpelvic
  8. lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: a reassessment. Urology 1995, 46,
  9. 352-355.
  10. [4] deKernion, J. B., Neuwirth, H., Stein, A., Dorey, F., Stenzl, A., Han-
  11. nah, ]., Blyth, B.: Prognosis of patients with stage Dl prostate cancer follo-
  12. wing radical prostatectomy with and without early endocrine therapy. J. Urol.
  13. 1990, 144, 700-703.
  14. [5] Donohue, R. E., Mani, J. H., Whitesel, J. A., Augspurger, R. R., Wil-
  15. liams, G., Fauver, J. E.: \ntraoperative and early complications of staging
  16. pehic lymph node dissection in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Urology 1990, 35,
  17. 223-227.
  18. [6] Grossman, I. C, Carpinello, V., Greenberg, S. H., Malloy, T. R., Wein,
  19. A. ].: Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: review of
  20. 91 cases. J. Urol. 1980, 124, 632-634.
  21. [7] Guazzoni, G., Montors, F., Bergamaschi, E, Bellinzoni, P, Contemero,
  22. A., Consonni, P, Rigatti, P: Open surgical rezńsion of laparoscopic pehic lym-
  23. phadenectomy for staging of prostate cancer: the impact of laparoscopic
  24. learning curue. J. Urol. 1994, 151, 930-933.
  25. [8] Herrell, S. D., Trachtenberg, ]., Theodorescu, D.: Staging pelvic lympha-
  26. denectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate: a comparision of 3 surgical tech-
  27. ni±ues. J. Urol. 1997, 157, 1337-1339.
  28. [9] Hoh, C. K., Seltzer, M. A., Franklin, J., deKernion, J. B., Phelps, M. E.,
  29. Belldegrun, A.: Positron emission tomography in urological Oncology. J. Urol.
  30. 1998, 159, 347-356.
  31. [10] McDowell, G. C, Johnson, J. W., Tenney, D. M., Johnson, D. E.: Pelvic
  32. lymphadenectomy for staging Clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 1990,35,
  33. 476-482.
  34. [U] O'Dowd, G. J., Veltri, R. W., Orozco, R., Miller, M. C, Oesterling, J. E.:
  35. Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
  36. J. Urol. 1997,158, 687-698.
  37. [12] Para, R. O., Andrus, C, Boullier, J.: Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymph node
  38. dissection: comparision of results with open pelvic lymphadenectomy. J. Urol. 1992,
  39. part 2,147, 875.
  40. [13] Perrotti, M., Gentle, D. L., Barada, J. H., Wilbur, H. J., Kaufman, R. P. Jr.:
  41. Mini-laparotomy pelvic lymph node dissection minimizes morbidity, hospitalization
  42. and cost ofpelvic lymph node dissection. J. Urol. 1996,155, 986-988.
  43. [14] Petros, J. A., Chandhoke, P. S., Clayman, R. V., Catalona, W. J.: Staging
  44. pełnie lymphadenectomy: a comparision of laparoscopic and open techni±ues. J. Urol.
  45. 1992,147,125, 245A.
  46. [15] Raboy, A., Adler, H., Albert, P.: Extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node
  47. dissection: a review of 125 patients. J. Urol. 1997,158, 2202-2205.
  48. [16] Rukstalis, D. B., Gerber, G. S., Yogelzang, N. J., Haraf, D. J., Straus,
  49. F. H., Chodak, G. W.: Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: a reniew of
  50. 103 consecutwe cases. J. Urol. 1994, 151, 670-674.
  51. [17] Scheussler, W. M, Vancaillie, T. G., Reich, H., Griffith, D. P.: Transperi-
  52. toneal endosurgical lymphadenectomy in patients with localized prostate can-
  53. cer. J. Urol. 1991, 145, 988-991.
  54. [18] Scheussler, W. M., Pharand, D., Vancaillie, T.: Laparoscopic standard
  55. pelvic node dissection for carcinoma of the prostate: is it accurate? J. Urol. 1993,
  56. 150, 898-901.
  57. [19] Seay, T. M., Blute, M. L., Zincke, H.: Long-term outcome in patients with
  58. pTxN + adenocarcinoma of prostate treated with radical prostatectomy and early
  59. androgen ablation. J. Urol. 1998, 159, 357-364.
  60. [20] Steinberg, G. D., Epstein, J. I., Piantadosi, S., Walsh, P.: Management of
  61. stage Dl adenocarcinoma of the prostate: The ]ohn Hopkins Hospital experience
  62. 1974 to 1987. J. Urol. 1990, 144, 1425-1432.
  63. [21] Steiner, M. S., Marshall, F. F.: Mini-laparotomy staging pelvic lymphade-
  64. nectomy (minilap). Urology 1993, 41, 201-206.
  65. [22] Stone, N. N., Stock, R. G., Unger, R: Laparoscopic pefoic lymph node
  66. dissection for prostate cancer: comparision of the extended and modified techni-
  67. ±ues. J. Urol. 1997, 158, 1891-1894.
  68. [23] Szymanowski, J., Rykowski, }., Herlinger, G.: Topografia przerzutów do
  69. węzłów chłonnych u chorych po prostatektomii radykalne]. Urol. Pol. 1997, 50,
  70. 2A supl, 85, 98.