PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

Transrectal biopsy in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma
Article published in Urologia Polska 1983/36/2.

authors

Janusz Dembowski, Jarowit Stolarczyk, Jerzy Lorenz, Lucjan Otręba
Klinika Urologicznej AM we Wrocławiu
Kierownik: doc. dr hab. med. J. Stolarczyk

summary

Forty-two transireotal needle bioipsias of the prostate were done with a Vim~ -Silveriman-Firankilin needle for confipmdng the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. In 90.0% of patients a (sufficient aimount of the tissue was obtained, and in 57.8p/o of cases the clinical diagnosis was comiinmed. The prepairation of the patient for the procedurę, complications and evaliuation of its effects are described.

references

  1. Ashby E. C, Rees M., Dowding C. H.: Prophylaxis against systematic in­
  2. fection after traosreotal biopsy for isuspected prostatic carcinoma. Brit. Med. J.,
  3. 1978, 2, 1267.
  4. Bissada N. K.: Accuracy of transurethral resection of prostatae
  5. vers.us transreotal needle biopsy dn the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. J. Urol.,
  6. 1977, 118, 61.
  7. Breslin J. A., Turner B. J., Faber R. B., Rhamy R. K.: Anaero-
  8. bic infection as conse±uence of transrectal prostatic biopsy. J. Uiroll., il978, 120.
  9. Davison P., Malament M.: Urinary contaminatiioin as a result of traosrectal
  10. biapsy of the prostate. J. Urol., 1971, 105, 545
  11. Denton S. E., Valk W. L.,
  12. Jacobson J. M., Kettunen R. C: Comipariison of the perineal needle biopsy and
  13. the 'tranaurethral proistatectoimy in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoima: an ana-
  14. lysis of 300 cases. J. Ural., 1967, 97, 127.
  15. Epstein N. A.: Prostatic biopisy.
  16. A marphologic comrelaitian of asipiratiom cytology with needle biojpsy hdistology.
  17. Cancer, 1067, 38, 2078.
  18. Engel R. M. E.: Prostatic needle biopsy: Camparison
  19. of needles. J. Urol., (1976, 115, 715.
  20. Fawcett D. P., Eykyn S., Bultitude M. J-'
  21. Urinary tract infection following transrectal biopsy of the prostaty. Brit. J. Urol.,
  22. 1975, 47, 679.
  23. Ostrojf E. B., Almario J., Kramer H.: Transrectal needle method
  24. for biopsy of itne prostate ? Tevieiw of 90 cases. Am. Surg., 1975, 41, ?59.
  25. Posta B., Streit B., Schmauzer J., Konyves K.: Value of transurethral biopsy in
  26. the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate. Int. Urol. Nephrol., 1979, 10, 301.
  27. Ruebush T. K., Mc Conville J. H., Galia F. M.: A doiubleblind study of
  28. trimethiriopnim ? suilfaimethoxazoile prophylaxis in patients haying transrecital
  29. needle Mopsy of the prostate. J. Urol., 1979, 122, 492.
  30. Scott R.: Needle
  31. biopsy in carcinoma of the prostatae. JAMA., 1967, 201, 958.
  32. Zincke H.,
  33. Campbell J. D., Vtz C. D., Farrow G. M., Anderson M. J.: Confidence in the
  34. negative. Transrectal needle foiopsy. Surg. Gynec. Obst., 1973, 136, 78.
  35. Wendel
  36. R. G., Evans A. T.: Compiiications of punch biopsy in the prostate gland. J. Urol.,
  37. 1967, 97, 122.